Dear setlockers: I found a thing!

Hey guys?  Has anybody noticed one of our twitter promo photos for “The Sign of Three” is actually, secretly, sinister as hell ?

image


Oh look!  Birds on the card!  How nice!  Only, wait, where have we seen a lot of birds before recently?  Oops!

image

Oh dear.   Jim’s personal seal in The Reichenbach Fall is this image of a “thieving magpie”, which is seen on the envelope he sends the fairy tale book in and in the envelope full of breadcrumbs.  It looks a lot like the bird on the above card.  They’re not identical, but please note that from the lighter patches on the wings, the shape of the head, the long, slightly curved beaks and (especially) the long tail, a very good case could be made for the birds on the card being magpies.  They’re sure as hell not doves.

In fact, there are also bird motifs all over The Reichenbach Fall: in the IOU graffiti seen painted in the background of scenes (which has large feathery wings) and in the soundtrack (“The Thieving Magpie” by Gioachino Rossini).  In case you’re wondering why Jim’s symbol is a magpie, it’s partly because they’re traditionally bad luck and famously known for stealing things, but it gets better.  What was it again that prevented Hansel and Gretel from following their breadcrumb trail home after they narrowly avoided being murdered in the woods?  Birds.   And now Sherlock is now trying to come home after playing dead for three years and BAM.  Birds

(Follow jump for the part of this thought that includes proper spoilers, if inclined.)

Read More

Thoughts on the (spoilered) shape of things to come

Just a quick note on the big thing that apparently happens in 3x02 — which has nothing to do with the fall puzzle solution, but what the hell? Hopeful thoughts for Johnlockers and people just generally put off the the concept after the jump. Also SPOILERS, so mind the gap.

Read More

No Ball, No Clones, No Fish: This Is My (Fringe) Theory On How Sherlock Survived the Fall

I’ve posted a lot of non-fall-related Reichenbachian theories recently, but I suppose I can only put off addressing the big question for so long.  How did Sherlock Holmes jump off a four-story building and live (plus what was up with him looking very dead on the street a few seconds later)?

Below is my theory on the matter.  It’s a little different from other theories I’ve read so far, possibly because I’m coming at it with a different set of biases regarding what constitutes an acceptable solution to the puzzle.  Or maybe because I just plain never liked the ball.

Read More

Why I don’t think Sherlock stopped his pulse with a ball.

So if you’ve at all been keeping up with internet Reichenbachian speculation, by now, you’ve almost certaintly heard about idea that Sherlock might have used a rubber ball to make it seem like he had no pulse — a fairly well known magic trick.

It’s a pretty cool idea, and admittedly, we do see Sherlock bouncing a ball around the lab at Barts just prior to his meeting with Jim.  I’m just not convinced it makes a ton of sense when you start examining it closely.

Read More

Some further explanation of the Mycroft Hypothesis.

So, this works out to be more-or-less part two of my previously posted Mycroft-was-in-on it Reichenbach scenario.  So if you haven’t read that, go do that first, and then follow the link back over here.   Otherwise it’ll all just sound crazy.

This part gets a bit complicated, but is meant mainly to address how Mycroft’s newspaper gambit would have worked to prevent John from digging any further into Kitty Riley’s story after Sherlock’s fake death.  (Okay, maybe more than a bit complicated.)

Read More

Have you tweeted/e-mailed/contacted Steven Moffat or Mark Gatiss about the glove idea? I think it's worth asking.

—asked by: ledbytheleastamongus

I hadn’t even thought of this.   It seems like if the not-wearing-gloves thing were a clue they’d either ignore the question or deny it with some sort of production-related excuse.  Because they’re sneaky.  Anybody got an idea of how we could ask about it without directly asking about it?

But WOW is this all over my dash right now.  I love that people are still catching things like these.  Definitely thinking it’s an earpiece used by Martin Freeman to synch his lines with Benedict Cumberbatch’s.  Using the phone would have been a more elegant solution, but I don’t know everything about how that sort of thing works.  Keeping track of everybody’s motivation in this episode is tricky enough, so making a John-was-in-on it hypothesis work would require a lot of rethinking.  Reblogged out of observant-ness appreciation and for sheer Reichenbachanalia’s sake.

(Source: panicisnatural, via toopreciousforthisworld)

I read your theory about the fall. I understand that the key is fake...but if the key if fake, how did moriarty create Richard Brook? I've managed to talk myself into a paradox, and was wondering if you could help me out.

—asked by: codenamesherlock

Oh, I like this question. Also, I over-relate to talking yourself into paradoxes. 

The short answer to this is that Jim didn’t do an exceptionally good job  of “creating” Rich Brook; Kitty Riley is just a very bad reporter.

Read More

Well, I don’t know what THIS is, but it looks a lot like something.

Here’s a little quirk in “The Reichenbach Fall” that I don’t think anybody’s talking about yet.  Apparently, if we just take the dialogue in the episode at face value, Sherlock’s level of understanding of the computer key code is suspiciously variable.

Here, chatting with Jim in 221B, he has a handle on the fact that a key that will let you break into any bank is not something you need to sell:

Even after Jim gives him an excuse and tries to change the subject? Sherlock is not having any of that:

But wait, there’s more.

Read More

What about the comment from Gattis about "BatSu" on the Belgravia commentary? He says that's what got "Sherlock out of the Reichenbach Fall" There's a link to audio on my tumblr.

—asked by: vigwig

Gatiss is referring the Bartitsu, a martial art which Sherlock Holmes was supposed to have studied in the original stories.  More specifically, he’s referring to “The Adventure of the Empty House”, where it’s explained that Sherlock’s Bartitsu skills helped him survive his encounter with Moriarty at the actual Reichenbach Falls.  That encounter is completely different from the one we get in Sherlock, though; Holmes never actually fell, he just won a fight with Moriarty and then scrambled around on a bunch of ledges to make it look like he did.  I’m oversimplifying a bit, but I’m pretty sure Gatiss was just talking about what happened in the books and not dropping a hint. You can read the original story here if you want to decide for yourself if anything seems relevant there.