No Ball, No Clones, No Fish: This Is My (Fringe) Theory On How Sherlock Survived the Fall

I’ve posted a lot of non-fall-related Reichenbachian theories recently, but I suppose I can only put off addressing the big question for so long.  How did Sherlock Holmes jump off a four-story building and live (plus what was up with him looking very dead on the street a few seconds later)?

Below is my theory on the matter.  It’s a little different from other theories I’ve read so far, possibly because I’m coming at it with a different set of biases regarding what constitutes an acceptable solution to the puzzle.  Or maybe because I just plain never liked the ball.

Read More

Why I don’t think Sherlock stopped his pulse with a ball.

So if you’ve at all been keeping up with internet Reichenbachian speculation, by now, you’ve almost certaintly heard about idea that Sherlock might have used a rubber ball to make it seem like he had no pulse — a fairly well known magic trick.

It’s a pretty cool idea, and admittedly, we do see Sherlock bouncing a ball around the lab at Barts just prior to his meeting with Jim.  I’m just not convinced it makes a ton of sense when you start examining it closely.

Read More

Some further explanation of the Mycroft Hypothesis.

So, this works out to be more-or-less part two of my previously posted Mycroft-was-in-on it Reichenbach scenario.  So if you haven’t read that, go do that first, and then follow the link back over here.   Otherwise it’ll all just sound crazy.

This part gets a bit complicated, but is meant mainly to address how Mycroft’s newspaper gambit would have worked to prevent John from digging any further into Kitty Riley’s story after Sherlock’s fake death.  (Okay, maybe more than a bit complicated.)

Read More

Have you tweeted/e-mailed/contacted Steven Moffat or Mark Gatiss about the glove idea? I think it's worth asking.

—asked by: ledbytheleastamongus

I hadn’t even thought of this.   It seems like if the not-wearing-gloves thing were a clue they’d either ignore the question or deny it with some sort of production-related excuse.  Because they’re sneaky.  Anybody got an idea of how we could ask about it without directly asking about it?

But WOW is this all over my dash right now.  I love that people are still catching things like these.  Definitely thinking it’s an earpiece used by Martin Freeman to synch his lines with Benedict Cumberbatch’s.  Using the phone would have been a more elegant solution, but I don’t know everything about how that sort of thing works.  Keeping track of everybody’s motivation in this episode is tricky enough, so making a John-was-in-on it hypothesis work would require a lot of rethinking.  Reblogged out of observant-ness appreciation and for sheer Reichenbachanalia’s sake.

(Source: ohheyitshanna, via itsthisorcluedo)

I read your theory about the fall. I understand that the key is fake...but if the key if fake, how did moriarty create Richard Brook? I've managed to talk myself into a paradox, and was wondering if you could help me out.

—asked by: codenamealice

Oh, I like this question. Also, I over-relate to talking yourself into paradoxes. 

The short answer to this is that Jim didn’t do an exceptionally good job  of “creating” Rich Brook; Kitty Riley is just a very bad reporter.

Read More

Well, I don’t know what THIS is, but it looks a lot like something.

Here’s a little quirk in “The Reichenbach Fall” that I don’t think anybody’s talking about yet.  Apparently, if we just take the dialogue in the episode at face value, Sherlock’s level of understanding of the computer key code is suspiciously variable.

Here, chatting with Jim in 221B, he has a handle on the fact that a key that will let you break into any bank is not something you need to sell:

Even after Jim gives him an excuse and tries to change the subject? Sherlock is not having any of that:

But wait, there’s more.

Read More

What about the comment from Gattis about "BatSu" on the Belgravia commentary? He says that's what got "Sherlock out of the Reichenbach Fall" There's a link to audio on my tumblr.

—asked by: vigwig

Gatiss is referring the Bartitsu, a martial art which Sherlock Holmes was supposed to have studied in the original stories.  More specifically, he’s referring to “The Adventure of the Empty House”, where it’s explained that Sherlock’s Bartitsu skills helped him survive his encounter with Moriarty at the actual Reichenbach Falls.  That encounter is completely different from the one we get in Sherlock, though; Holmes never actually fell, he just won a fight with Moriarty and then scrambled around on a bunch of ledges to make it look like he did.  I’m oversimplifying a bit, but I’m pretty sure Gatiss was just talking about what happened in the books and not dropping a hint. You can read the original story here if you want to decide for yourself if anything seems relevant there.

Mycroft Was In On It: A Reichenbach Hypothesis.

In the original Sherlock Holmes stories, Mycroft was the only one who knew that Holmes was alive after Moriarty went over the falls.  In “The Reichenbach Fall” Sherlock and Mycroft are more about feuding than cooperating.  Unless of course, Mycroft was in on it and feud was just meant to fool John.

Turns out there’s actually a bit of evidence to support the idea that Sherlock and Mycroft might have been cooperating as bit more than they initially appear to be in 2x03.

Below is that evidence and a hypothesis that makes use of it.

Read More

I really like all of the theories that you've posted because they all make so much sense to me! I enjoy them. It helps me cope with what happened in Reichenbach.

—asked by: a-wild-panda-appeared-and

Hey, thanks.  That’s very nice to hear.  I’m actually new to the Tumblr-ing experience; I joined because wanted a place to go with some of these thoughts, and also to find the other Reichenbach theorists of the internet (Reichenbloggers, maybe?) and find out what they’re thinking, too.  There will definitely be more, but in the meantime, if anybody has Reichenbachian links or questions or thoughts they want to share, I’m all for that.

Posted